IVF-ET中内膜整理术对子宫内膜容受性影响的经阴道三维超声评价

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To analyze the endometrial impact of endometrial finishing technique in IVF-ET patients, discuss to improve endometrial receptivity and the clinical significance of the clinical pregnancy rate using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound. Methods: One hundred and three patients treated with IVF-ET at our hospital were collected. All patients had failed more than three times and had the indication of endometrial finishing surgery. Patients were divided into organize group(55 patients were implemented endometrial finishing surgery) and unstructured group(48 patients did not have the surgery). Detected endometrial volume, thickness, type, endometrial and subendometrial blood flow parameters(RI, PI, S?蛐D, VI, FI, VFI) by ultrasound in ET day and HCG day and tracked pregnancy outcomes. Results: There was no difference in the general situation between the two groups(P>0.05), no difference in endometrial volume and thickness between the two groups in ET day and HCG day(P>0.05). Endometrial blood flow(PI, RI, S?蛐D) in organize group were lower than the unstructured group(P<0.05), FI in organize group was higher than the unstructured group in ET day(P<0.05), before and after the endometrial finishing surgery, endometrial blood flow(PI, RI, FI) were different(P<0.05), the pregnancy rate in organize group was higher than the unstructured group. Conclusion: Endometrial finishing technique can improve endometrial blood flow and are helpful to improve embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy rate.

Key words： Endometrium Ultrasonography, Doppler, color

Received: 02 June 2016

PACS:	Ｒ711.32
	Ｒ445.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Ling1
	YU Jiao-jiao2
	HU Bing1
	ZHAO Yun2

Cite this article:

CHEN Ling1,YU Jiao-jiao2,HU Bing1, et al. Value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound evaluating endometrial receptivity of #br# endometrial rectification in IVF-ET[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 28(2): 123-126.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2017/V28/I2/123

[1]Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE[J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(9): 2571-2584.
[2]Chen ZY, Liao JY, Zhou QL, et al. Assessment and Application of Ultrasound in Ovarian Reserve and Endometrial Receptivity During In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Treatment[J]. Curr Med Imaging Reviews, 2014, 10(1): 2-11.
[3]Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2006, 12(6): 731-746.
[4]Rashid NA, Lalitkumar S, Lalitkumar PG, et al. Endometrial receptivity and human embryo implantation[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 2011, 66(1): 23-30.
[5]Riad ON, Hak AA. Assessment of endometrial receptivity using Doppler ultrasonography in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2014, 30(1): 70-73.
[6]Morad AWA, Farag MAE. Impact of letrozole on ultrasonographic markers of endometrial receptivity in polycystic ovary syndrome women with poor endometrial response to clomiphene citrate despite adequate ovulation[J]. Midd East Fertil Soc J, 2015, 20(3): 182-187.
[7]Kitaya K, Matsubayashi H, Takaya Y, et al. Clinical background affecting pregnancy outcome following local endometrial injury in infertile patients with repeated implantation failure[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2016, 18(2): 1-4.
[8]Mc Williams GD, Frattarelli JL. Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success[J]. Fertil Ster, 2007, 88(1): 74-81.
[9]Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, et al. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow[J]. Fertil Ster, 2001, 75(2): 361-366.
[10]Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2014, 20(4): 530-541.
[11]Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014, 29(3): 291-298.
[12]Al-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, Al-Hassan S, et al. The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) outcome[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2008, 6(1): 37-41.
[13]Dechaud H, Bessueille E, Bousquet PJ, et al. Optimal timing of ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation of uterine receptivity to implantation[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008, 16(3): 368-375.
[14]Kim A, Han J E, Yoon TK, et al. Relationship between endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and pregnancy after intrauterine insemination[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(2): 747-752.
[15]Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, et al. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2010, 8(1): 1-7.
[16]耿琳琳，王宁，王幼劬，等. 阴道超声评估子宫内膜容受性的研究[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志，2012，20（4）：253-256.