Abstract Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of reducing radiation dose in chest CT without compromising the image quality, by using iterative reconstruction technique(iDOSE4). Methods: Totally 180 subjects who underwent chest CT scanning were divided into 6 dose groups in turn. Different groups represent different scanning conditions. Compared the different tissue CT number between different groups. Results: The differences of standard deviation in lung and bone markings among A2 group, B group and C group were not statistically significant. The differences of standard deviation in lung and bone markings between A1 group and D group were not statistically significant, but this two groups have significant difference with E group and F group. The standard deviation in muscle markings between A1 group and C group, and in the main artery markings between A1 group and B group have no significant differences, but there were significant differences among other groups. And the standard deviation increased in the order of A2, B, A1 and C, D, E, F. Conclusion: Philip iCT can effectively reduce the radiation dose by using iterative reconstruction technique(iDOSE4), and 120 kV/100 mAs can be used as the suitable low-dose chest computed tomography scanning protocol.
LI Chun-zhi,WANG Wen-sheng,ZHANG Yi, et al. The clinical study of the relationship between different iterative reconstruction technique and image quality in low dose chest CT[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 29(5): 351-351.
[1]Romano RF, Salvadori PS, Torres LR, et al. Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose[J]. Radiol Bras, 2015, 48(5): 292-297.
[2]Kalra MK, Sodickson AD, Mayo-Smith WW. CT radiation: key concepts for gentle and wise use[J]. Radiographics, 2015, 35(6): 1706-1721.
[3]Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O＇Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(8): 863-871.
[4]Niu YT, Mehta D, Zhang ZR, et al. Radiation dose reduction in temporal bone CT with iterative reconstruction technique[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2012, 3(6): 1020-1026.
[5]Kordolaimi SD, Argentos S, Stathis G, et al. Radiation dose and image noise evaluation in coronary computed tomography angiography(CCTA) using an iterative reconstruction algorithm[J]. J Cardiol, 2014, 55(3): 184-190.
[6]Zowall H, Brewer C, Deutsch A. modeling of risks and benefits of lung cancer screening strategies using low-dose helical CT(Ldct) technology in Canada[J]. Value Health, 2015, 18(7): 372-373.
[7]李佩玲，蒋娜，赵宇，等. 滤波反投影法与迭代算法的图像质量及左心室功能评价准确性的比较研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2015，26（12）：869-872.
[8]Alshamari M, Geijer M, Norrman E, et al. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality[J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(7): 824-832.
2018, Vol. 29 
