胰腺术后胰瘘的术前影像评价研究进展

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2018.07.016

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (32)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (762 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) is the most common and serious complication after pancreatic operation. Preoperative prediction of pancreatic fistula has great significance in improving the treatment of postoperative stump, postoperative care, prevention and reduction of POPF. In addition to systemic factors and technical factors, pancreatic fistula is closely related with local factors of pancreatic stump. With the development of imaging technology, noninvasive imaging can realize multi-evaluation of morphology, texture and function of pancreatic stump, and make it possible to predict pancreatic fistula. In this paper, we will review the imaging evaluation index to predict pancreatic fistula, and summarize the new progress of imaging evaluation in recent five years.

Key words： Pancreatic fistula Tomography, X-ray computed Positron-emission tomography Ultrasonography

Received: 27 October 2017

PACS:	Ｒ657.5
	R814.42
	R817.4
	Ｒ445.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JI Ruo-yun
	SHI Yu
	GUO Qi-yong
	LIU Yan-qing

Cite this article:

JI Ruo-yun,SHI Yu,GUO Qi-yong, et al. Advance of radiographic evaluation of postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 29(7): 514-516.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/10.12117/jccmi.2018.07.016 OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V29/I7/514

[1]倪泉兴，徐永锋，张波. 胰瘘的现代概念及其防治策略[J]. 外科理论与实践，2011，16（5）：432-435.
[2]Lee SE, Yang SH, Jang JY, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: Interrupted vs continuous stitches[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(40): 5351-5356.
[3]Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, et al. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively[J]. HPB, 2010, 12(10): 696-702.
[4]Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group(ISGPF) definition[J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(1): 8-13.
[5]Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A, et al. Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surgery, 2010, 148(1): 15-23.
[6]Ridolfi C, Angiolini MR, Gavazzi F, et al. Morphohistological features of pancreatic stump are the main determinant of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Biomed Res Intern, 2014, 2014(8): 971-975.
[7]Frozanpor F, Loizou L, Ansorge C, et al. Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(8): 1858-1865.
[8]Kirihara Y, Takahashi N, Hashimoto Y, et al. Reply to letter: prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(6): 167-168.
[9]Chen HP, Shao WX, Long DY, et al. Value of preoperative computed tomography for prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. World Chin J Digestol, 2015, 23(9): 1489.
[10]Hashimoto Y, Sclabas GM, Takahashi N, et al. Dual-phase computed tomography for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis and anastomotic failure risk following pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(12): 2193-2204.
[11]Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Grendar J, et al. Preoperative CT scan to predict pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy using gland and tumor characteristics[J]. Am J Surg, 2016, 211(5): 871-876.
[12]Sandini M, Bernasconi DP, Ippolito D, et al. Preoperative computed tomography to predict and stratify the risk of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(31): e754.
[13]Kanda M, Fujii T, Kodera Y. Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2011, 98(2): 268-274.
[14]Kanda M, Fujii T, Suenaga M, et al. Estimated pancreatic parenchymal remnant volume accurately predicts clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Surgery, 2014, 156(3): 601-610.
[15]Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Kobayashi T, et al. Pancreatic perfusion data and post-pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 194(2): 441-449.
[16]Noda Y, Goshima S, Tanaka K, et al. Findings in pancreatic MRI associated with pancreatic fibrosis and HbA1c values[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(3): 680-687.
[17]Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Tanaka K, et al. Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings—preliminary results[J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(3): 791-799.
[18]Arai T, Kobayashi A, Yokoyama T, et al. Signal intensity of the pancreas on magnetic resonance imaging: Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula after a distal pancreatectomy using a triple-row stapler[J]. Pancreatology, 2015, 15(4): 380-386.
[19]Frkjr JB, Olesen SS, Drewes AM. Fibrosis, atrophy, and ductal pathology in chronic pancreatitis are associated with pancreatic function but independent of symptoms[J]. Pancreas, 2013, 42(7): 1182-1187.
[20]Tanaka K, Tomita H, Osada S, et al. Significance of histopathological evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis to predict postoperative course after pancreatic surgery[J]. Ant Res, 2015, 35(3): 1749-1756.
[21]Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee KB, et al. Pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis: quantitative assessment with preoperative multiparametric MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2016, 279(1): 140-150.
[22]Bian Y, Wang L, Chen C, et al. Quantification of pancreatic exocrine function of chronic pancreatitis with secretin-enhanced MRCP[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(41): 7177-7182.
[23]Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Kitasato A, et al. Patient allocation based on preoperative assessment of pancreatic fibrosis to secure pancreatic anastomosis performed by trainee surgeons: a prospective study[J]. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci, 2010, 17(6): 831-838.
[24]Shi Y, Guo Q, Xia F, et al. MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?[J]. Radiology, 2014, 273(1): 88-98.
[25]Shi Y, Glaser KJ, Venkatesh SK, et al. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 41(2): 369-375.
[26]Schrader H, Wiese M, Ellrichmann M, et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative EUS elastography for malignant pancreatic tumors: relationship with pancreatic fibrosis[J]. Ultraschall Der Medizin, 2012, 33(7): 196-201.
[27]Lee TK, Kang CM, Park MS, et al. Prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after pancreatectomy: assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(5): 781-786.
[28]Harada N, Ishizawa T, Inoue Y, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the pancreas for estimation of pathologic fibrosis and risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 219(5): 887-894.
[29]Hatano M, Watanabe J, Kushihata F, et al. Quantification of pancreatic stiffness on intraoperative ultrasound elastography and evaluation of its relationship with postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. Intern Surg, 2015, 100(3): 497-502.
[30]刘恩涛，王淑侠，谢淑飞，等. 慢性肿块型胰腺炎的18F-FDG PET/CT影像学表现[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学，2012，9（6）：466-469.
[31]Rijkers AP, Valkema R, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al. Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014, 40(7): 794-804.
[32]Matsumoto I, Shirakawa S, Shinzeki M, et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography does not aid in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 11(6): 712-718.