|
|
|
| Diagnosis of fetal cavum septum pellucidum abnormalities by 3.0T MRI |
| YIN Xing, ZHAO Xin, ZHANG Li-ying, YUAN Rui |
| The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI on fetal abnormalities of cavum septum pellucidum. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-one pregnant women, aged from 18 to 41 years(average 28 years) with gestation weeks from 21 to 40 weeks(average 26 weeks), and with fetal abnormalities ultrasound of cavum septum pellucidum, were studied with a 3.0T MRI unit within seventy-two hours after ultrasound studies. The imaging protocol included half-flourier acquisition single-shot turb spin-echo and true fast imaging and fast low angle shot and DWI sequences in the axial, frontal and sagittal planes relative to the fetal brain. MRI findings were compared with prenatal US. Results: Of the 261 pregnant women, 264 live fetuses were found(twins 3 cases), 50 cases with septum pellucidum absence and corpus callosum hypoplasia, 110 cases with small cavum septum pellucidum, 12 cases with enlarged cavum septum pellucidum, 7 cases with isolated absence of cavum septum pellucidum, 3 cases with septum pellucidum and without cavum, 2 cases with septum pellucidum partial absence and normal corpus callosum, 2 cases with septum pellucidum absence and holoprosencephaly, and 78 cases with negative results. Ultrasound diagnosis of 60 cases were completed, 44 cases were corrected and by MRI results and 160 cases etc. diagnosis were the same as ultrasound. Conclusion: Prenatal MRI is effective in the assessment of fetal abnormalities of cavum septum pellucidum; it can yield information additional to that obtained with US, especially complicated with cerebral hemorrhage, midline lipoma or midline cyst. And it further corrects US diagnosis.
|
|
Received: 13 February 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]Sundarakumar DK, Farley SA, Smith CM, et al. Absent cavum septum pellucidum: a review with emphasis on associated commissural abnormalities[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2015, 45(7): 950-964.
[2]殷林亮，夏飞，邓学东. 透明隔腔的产前超声研究进展[J]. 中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2013，10（12）：970-975.
[3]Cooper S, Katorza E, Berkenstadt M, et al. Prenatal abnormal width of the cavum septum pellucidum—MRI features and neurodevelopmental outcome[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med, 2018, 31(22): 3043-3050.
[4]Torky HA, Moussa AA, Ahmad AM, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound first trimester fetal volume measurement and its relation to pregnancy outcome[J]. J Perinat Med, 2017, 45(9): 1039-1044.
[5]马晓亮，张国福. 磁共振成像在胎儿中枢神经系统中的应用进展[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2018，37（6）：1056-1060.
[6]田甜，杨太珠，杨帆，等. 产前超声检查与磁共振成像在胎儿透明隔腔异常诊断中的对比分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志：电子版，2013，9（3）：376-378.
[7]凌晨，邓学东，陆伟，等. 胎儿前脑无裂畸形产前诊断分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2012，9（7）：597-601.
[8]张波，杨太珠，朱琦，等. 经超声诊断的胎儿孤立性透明隔腔消失的临床预后[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2013，24（12）：866-868.
[9]焦北鱼，王锡明，王光彬，等. 胎儿透明隔腔消失的超声与MRI对比分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报，2012，34（18）：1888-1892.
[10]Victoria T, Johnson AM, Edgar JC, et al. Comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI for fetal imaging: is there an advantage to imaging with a higher field strength?[J]. AJR, 2016, 206(1): 195-201.
[11]Prayer D, Malinger G, Brugger PC, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(5): 671-680.
[12]Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, et al. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(5): 745-757.
[13]Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(4): 388-393. |
|
|
|
