体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像评价胰腺纤维化的初步研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨磁共振体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像（IVIM-DWI）在胰腺纤维化评价中的价值。方法：收集15例健康志愿者（对照组）及45例胰头体部或壶腹部病变并行胰十二指肠切除术的患者（病变组），病变组术前一周内均行3.0T IVIM-DWI检查及术后胰腺断端纤维化分期评价（F0期15例，F1期10例，F2期11例，F3期9例），由两名具有5年以上腹部影像诊断经验的放射科医师于胰腺断端处绘制感兴趣区（ROI），测得真实扩散系数（D），假性扩散系数（D*）及灌注分数（f）值，采用Spearman秩相关系数及受试者工作特性曲线（ROC）分析D、D*、f值与胰腺纤维化间的相关性及诊断胰腺纤维化分期的效能。结果：两名测量者间测得受试者的D、D*、f值的一致性良好（ICC：0.925、0.907、0.823）。f值与纤维化分期的相关性略高于D和D*（Spearman相关性检验：r=-0.651、-0.392、-0.523，P分别为<0.001、0.002、<0.001）。f值区分F0/（F1～F3）期、（F0，F1）/（F2，F3）的曲线下面积略高于D及D*（F0比（F1～F3）：0.822、0.662、0.764；（F0，F1）比（F2，F3）：0.876、0.772、0.799），但差异无统计学意义（P均大于0.05）。结论：IVIM-DWI成像是一种良好的胰腺纤维化的分期方法。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘艳清1
	刘莹1
	史凯宁2
	王小奇2
	王敏1
	石喻1
	郭启勇1

关键词 ：胰腺疾病, 纤维化, 磁共振成像

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging(IVIM-DWI) for the evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis. Methods: A total of 15 healthy volunteers and 45 patients(F0: 15, F1: 10, F2: 11, F3: 9) with pancreatic or ampullary masses and subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy underwent preoperative 3.0T MR IVIM imaging within less than one week. IVIM-DWI parameters(true diffusion coefficient(D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient(D*), and perfusion fraction(f)) were measured independently by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in abdominal imaging diagnosis. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between D, D*, f values and pancreatic fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) analysis was to determine the diagnostic performance of IVIM parameters for staging of pancreatic fibrosis(F0～F3). Results: The D, D* and f values measured by the two subjects were excellent(ICC: 0.925, 0.907, 0.823). f values showed a better negative correlation with fibrosis stages(r=-0.651, P<0.001) than D(r=-0.392, P=0.002) and D*(r=-0.523, P<0.001). f values had higher area under the curve(AUC) than that of D and D*(F0 vs (F1～F3): AUC=0.822, 0.662, 0.764, respectively; (F0, F1) vs (F2, F3): AUC=0.876, 0.772, 0.799, respectively), though without statistical significance(all P>0.05). Conclusion: IVIM-DWI is a promising method for staging of pancreatic fibrosis.

Key words： Pancreatic diseases Fibrosis Magnetic resonance imaging

收稿日期: 2017-07-11

PACS:	Ｒ576
	Ｒ445.2

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目（81471718，81401376）；中国医科大学国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金培育项目
（YQ20160005）；盛京杰出人才计划（Sjjcrc-01）。

通讯作者: 石喻，中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科，110004。E-mail：18940259980@163.com

作者简介: 刘艳清（1992-），女，辽宁沈阳人，在读硕士研究生。E-mail：15942352983@163.com

引用本文:

刘艳清1，刘莹1，史凯宁2，王小奇2，王敏1，石喻1，郭启勇1. 体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像评价胰腺纤维化的初步研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28(10): 736-741.
LIU Yan-qing1, LIU Ying1, SHI Kai-ning2, WANG Xiao-qi2, WANG Min1, SHI Yu1, GUO Qi-yong1. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging for the evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis: a preliminary study. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 28(10): 736-741.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V28/I10/736

[1]Ceyhan GO, Friess H. Pancreatic disease in 2014: Pancreatic fibrosis and standard diagnostics[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 12(2): 68-70.
[2]Kang KM, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions[J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(2): 444-453.
[3]Ma C, Li Y, Wang L, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion DWI of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas: monoexponential and biexponential apparent diffusion parameters and histopathological correlations[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2017, 17(1): 12.
[4]Witt H, Apte M V, Keim V, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy[J]. Gastroenterology, 2007, 132(4): 1557-1573.
[5]Apte M, Pirola R, Wilson J. The fibrosis of chronic pancreatitis: new insights into the role of pancreatic stellate cells[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2011, 15(10): 2711-2722.
[6]Kelly KA, Hollingsworth MA, Brand RE, et al. Advances in Biomedical Imaging, Bioengineering, and Related Technologies for the Development of Biomarkers of Pancreatic Disease: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Workshop[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44(8): 1185-1194.
[7]Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Tanaka K, et al. Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings-preliminary results[J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(3): 791-799.
[8]Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee KB, et al. Pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis: quantitative assessment with preoperative multiparametric MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2015, 279(1): 140-150.
[9]Garcia-Carracedo D, Yu CC, Akhavan N, et al. Smad4 loss synergizes with TGFα overexpression in promoting pancreatic metaplasia, PanIN development, and fibrosis[J]. PLoS one, 2015, 10(3): e0120851.
[10]Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, et al. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively[J]. HPB(Oxford), 2010, 12(10): 696-702.
[11]Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Morisaka H, et al. MRI-based staging of hepatic fibrosis: Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging with magnetic resonance elastography[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 42(1): 204-210.
[12]Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Kobayashi T, et al. Pancreatic perfusion data and post-pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 194(2): 441-449.
[13]Tanaka K, Tomita H, Osada S, et al. Significance of histopathological evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis to predict postoperative course after pancreatic surgery[J]. Anticancer Res, 2015, 35(3): 1749-1756.
[14]Klau M, Gaida MM, Lemke A, et al. Fibrosis and Pancreatic Lesions: Counterintuitive Behavior of the Diffusion Imaging-Derived Structural Diffusion Coefficient D[J]. Invest Radiol, 2013, 48(3): 129-133.
[15]Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic tumor fibrosis using shear wave elastography[J]. Pancreatology, 2016, 16(6): 1063-1068.
[16]Harada N, Ishizawa T, Inoue Y, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the pancreas for estimation of pathologic fibrosis and risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 219(5): 887-894.