3.0T MR NATIVE True-FISP与VIBE序列在肝脏门静脉成像中的对比研究

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2019.06.009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the application values of 3.0T MR NATIVE True-FISP sequence in hepatic portal venography by comparing with the research of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography(MRA) of the hepatic portal vein. Methods: Magnetic resonance enhancement imaging and NATIVE True-FISP sequence hepatic portal vein imaging were performed in 17 patients with suspected hepatic lesions in our hospital. The scanned images were subjectively scored by two deputy directors MR diagnosticians for the display of the portal vein and its branches, and compared the differences between the two examination methods for the portal vein were. Results: Fourteen patients completed the examination, while the other three did not because of trouble breathing. The NATIVE True-FISP sequence showed that its image quality of portal vein had no significant statistical difference(P>0.05) with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA. Conclusion: 3.0T MR NATIVE True-FISP sequence can achieve similar effects with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRA in hepatic portal vein imaging.

Key words： Liver diseases Magnetic resonance imaging

Received: 28 June 2018

PACS:	Ｒ575
	Ｒ445.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Bei-bei
	CHEN Liang
	LIU Yu-jia
	LIU Hai-rong
	ZHANG Lin
	TIAN Chun-mei

Cite this article:

ZHANG Bei-bei,CHEN Liang,LIU Yu-jia, et al. Evaluation of 3.0T MR NATIVE True-FISP sequence and VIBE sequence in hepatic portal venography: a comparative study[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 30(6): 413-415.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/10.12117/jccmi.2019.06.009 OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V30/I6/413

[1]Bruce R, Wentland AL, Haemel AK, et al. Incidence of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis Using Gadobenate Dimeglumine in 1423 Patients With Renal Insufficiency Compared With Gadodiamide[J]. Invest Radiol, 2016, 51(11): 701-705.
[2]Fraum TJ, Ludwig DR, Bashir MR, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: A comprehensive risk assessment[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 46(2): 338-353.
[3]Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, et al. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(7): 564-570.
[4]Zhang W, Lin J, Wang S, et al. Unenhanced respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography(MRA) of renal artery in hypertensive patients using true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique compared with contrast-enhanced MRA[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2014, 38(5): 700-704.
[5]王朋，张军，刁强，等. 流入翻转恢复序列磁共振血管成像对肾动脉检查扫描参数的优化[J]. 医学研究生学报，2015，28（2）：186-188.
[6]曹代荣，张宇阳，邓长松，等. Time-SLIP非对比增强肾动脉成像技术的可重复性研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2015，34（7）：1101-1105.
[7]时阳，崔红升，郝利国. 非对比剂增强磁共振血管成像在肾动脉成像中的应用研究[J]. 中国医学装备，2015，12（10）：72-74.
[8]武靖，刘伟，杜湘珂，等. 3.0T MR流入反转恢复序列门静脉成像及影响成像质量的技术因素[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2013，29（6）：1011-1014.
[9]张龙江，宋光义，包颜明，等. 肝脏血管解剖和变异的多层螺旋CT血管成像研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志，2005，39（9）：68-72.
[10]Heilmaier C, Sutter R, Lutz AM, et al. Mapping of hepatic vascular anatomy: dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64 detector row CT[J]. Radiology, 2007, 245(3): 872-880.
[11]杨世忠，董家鸿. 肝中静脉解剖及其临床意义[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2011，31（1）：100-102.
[12]姚斐斐，程敬亮，杨子涛，等. 3.0T非对比剂肝门静脉磁共振血管成像技术研究[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志，2013，21（11）：853-856.
[13]王超洪，孙志国，张琼，等. syngo NATIVE无对比剂MR血管成像技术[J]. 磁共振成像，2010，1（3）：214-217.
[14]Tsukuda T, Ito K, Koike S, et al. Pre- and postprandial alterations of portal venous flow: evaluation with single breath-hold three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo MR imaging and a selective inversion recovery tagging pulse[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(4): 527-533
[15]伍兵，孙家瑜，王成龙，等. 非对比剂增强的磁共振血管成像技术对于肝脏门静脉的评估价值[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志，2011，28（4）：670-675.