|
|
The value of self-made water phantom for 3.0T MRI cervical fat-suppression sequence scan |
WANG Rong, ZHU Da-rong, HAN Zhi-jiang, DING Jin-wang |
Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310006, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To investigate the application value of self-made water phantom in 3.0T MRI cervical frequency selective saturated fat-suppression sequence scan. Methods: Necks of 30 volunteers were treated with FS TSE(rapid spin echo) T1WI and FS TSE T2WI scan by same parameters of routine and water phantom sequences, respectively. The obtained images were subjective and objectively evaluated for comparative analysis. Results: During subjective evaluation, FS TSE T1WI grading were 1 case and 30 cases at grade 0, 4 cases and 0 case at grade 1, 8 cases and 0 case at grade 2, 17 cases and 0 case at grade 3 in routine group and water phantom group, respectively(all P<0.05). FS TSE T2WI grading were 0 case and 1 case at grade 0, 1 case and 29 cases at grade 1, 8 cases and 0 case at grade 2, 21 cases and 0 case at grade 3 in routine group and water phantom group, respectively(all P<0.05). During objective evaluation, signal to noise ratio of FS TSE T1WI at mandibular angle, cricoid and sternocleidomastoid muscle at sternoclavicular joint level were 25.00(4.53, 72.65) and 103.72 (99.77, 108.04), 9.05(3.45, 60.32) and 118.80(106.59, 123.94), 19.00(3.35, 61.21) and 101.74(87.38, 110.29) in routine group and water phantom group, respectively(all P<0.05); signal to noise ratio of FS TSE T1WI were 8.30(3.63, 13.91) and 15.26(12.68, 17.50), 3.84(2.86, 11.95) and 15.06(12.76, 16.88), 5.06(2.71, 13.40) and 14.46(11.47, 15.68) in routine group and water phantom group, respectively(all P<0.05). Conclusion: For 3.0T MRI cervical FS sequence scan, water phantom can obviously improve image quality, be operated simply and easy to popularize.
|
Received: 03 August 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Lu H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, Golae X, et al. Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(1): 13-22.
[2]Alecci M, Collins CM, Smith MB, et al. Radio-frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2001, 46(2): 379-385.
[3]郭勇,林伟,钱明珠,等. 臂丛神经磁共振IDEAL T2WI和CUBE Flex T2WI成像[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2011,19(7):499-502.
[4]肖建明,彭涛,陈志凡,等. 快速自旋回波与快速小角度激发抑脂序列在颈部增强扫描中的应用[J]. 中国医疗设备,2015,30(9):47-50.
[5]李颖,陈志安,乞文旭,等. GE 1.5T 430S MR频率饱和法与水脂分离法膝关节抑制脂肪图像比较分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2013,24(12):873-876.
[6]吴婧,卢铃铨,顾建平,等. 磁共振脂肪抑制技术在骨与关节病变中的应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2013,23(1):146-150.
[7]Gold GE, Reeder SB, Yu H, et al. Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession-initial experience[J]. Radiology, 2006, 240(2): 546-551.
[8]Karantanas AH, Zibis AH, Kitsoulis P. Fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-echo planar imaging: comparison with fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-gradient echo in imaging the cartilage of the knee[J]. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2002, 26(3): 159-165.
[9]Stabler A, Spieker A, Bonel H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist-comparison of high resolution pulse sequences and different fat signal suppression techniques in cadavers[J]. Rofo, 2000, 172(2): 168-174.
[10]Bley TA, Wieben O, Francois CJ, et al. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010, 31(1): 4-18.
[11]Zhang Z, Song L, Meng Q, et al. Segmented echo planar MR imaging of the brachial plexus with inversion recovery magnetization preparation at 3.OT[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008, 28(2): 440-444.
[12]李鹏,吕发金,勒都晓兰,等. 匀场辅助装置在臂丛神经成像中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2012,28(10):1906-1909. |
[1] |
LI Xin-ming1, JIA Hong-shun1, REN Yun-yan2, SHI Da1, YAN Chao-qun1,YUAN Yang-guang1, LI Shi-si1, LIANG Wen1, QUAN Xian-yue1 . MRI diagnosis of the third ventricular masses[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 28(4): 229-302. |
|
|
|
|