|
|
Analysis of intracranial vascular characteristics of cerebral infarction patients with low and#br# high risk according to the ESSEN stroke risk score by 3D-TOF-MRA |
WANG Lin, SHEN Guang-shu |
Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210001, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To discuss the correlations between the ESSEN stroke risk score(ESRS) and intracranial vascular stenosis, vascular branch density and the infarct size respectively by the retrospective analysis of intracranial vascular characteristics in the cerebral infarction patients. Methods: 104 cerebral infarction patients confirmed by head MRI examinations and 3D-TOF-MRA in our department from July 2016 to June 2017 were investigated retrospectively. General information of patients were registered, the ESRS score and the infarct size were measured, and the features including the number of intracranial vessels with stenosis and the vascular branch density were analyzed. Patients were divided into low risk group and high risk group according to the ESRS. The differences of vascular characteristics including the vascular stenosis rate, the vascular branch density and the infarct size between two groups were compared by Chi-square analysis. The correlations between the ESRS and the intracranial vascular stenosis, vascular branch density and the infarct size were analyzed by the Spearman rank correlation. Results: The low risk group showed lower rate of intracranial vascular stenosis and higher vascular branch density than the high risk group. The ESRS was moderately positively correlated with the intracranial vascular stenosis, moderately negatively correlated with the vascular branch density and weakly positively correlated with the infarct size. Conclusion: The ESRS shows high correlation with intracranial vascular lesions, and high risk patients have more possibility of intracranial vascular stenosis.
|
Received: 12 September 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1]段振鹏,代成波,张玉虎,等. 分支动脉粥样硬化病和小动脉闭塞的临床差异[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志,2015,32(3):196-200.
[2]Weimar C, Diener HC, Alberts MJ, et al. The ESSEN stroke risk score predicts recurrent cardiovascular events: a validation within the reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health(REACH) registry[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(2): 350-354.
[3]Chen P, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. A validation of the ESSEN stroke risk score in outpatients with ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 25(9): 2189-2195.
[4]张钤玮. 3D-TOF MRA在脑动脉粥样硬化筛查中的临床应用价值[J]. 现代医用影像学,2016,25(1):53-54;58.
[5]Cheng YC, Chen HC, Wu CH, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformation and dural arteriovenous fistulas: comparison of time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and three dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Iran J Radiol, 2016, 13(2): e19814.
[6]Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al. High-intensity signal in carotid plaque on routine 3D-TOF-MRA is a risk factor of ischemic stroke[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 41(1-2): 13-18.
[7]刘灿,黄雨晴,余雪菊,等. 高龄老年患者血清胆红素水平与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2017,19(3):277-279.
[8]陈小丽. 经颅多普勒超声(TCD)对高血压与糖尿病患者脑血管狭窄的诊断意义[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2016,23(4):154-155.
[9]刘然,华扬,贾凌云,等. 超声检测吸烟与颅内动脉狭窄相关性的多中心研究结果分析[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2017,14(6):297-301;312.
[10]李娜,华扬,贾凌云,等. 缺血性卒中住院患者年龄特征与头颈部大动脉病变分布的多中心研究结果分析[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2017,14(6):285-291.
[11]Liu Y, Wang Y, Li WA, et al. Validation of the ESSEN stroke risk score in different subtypes of ischemic stroke[J]. Neurol Res, 2017, 39(6): 504-508.
[12]赵卿,吕强,石进. 缺血性脑血管病患者脑动脉狭窄与ESSEN卒中风险评分的关系[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2014,11(2):69-73.
[13]Kaffashian S, Tzourio C, Zhu YC, et al. Differential effect of white-matter lesions and covert brain infarcts on the risk of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(7): 1923-1925.
[14]Windham BG, Griswold ME, Shibata D, et al. Covert neurological symptoms associated with silent infarcts from midlife to older age: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(5): 1218-1223.
[15]Sun S, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Lipid and hyperglycemia factors in first-ever penetrating artery infarction, a comparison between different subtypes[J]. Brain Behav, 2017, 7(6): e00694.
|
|
|
|