Stanford B型胸主动脉夹层腔内修复术后的临床随访观察

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2020.08.002

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular aortal repair(EVAR) and remodeling of aortic wall in patients with Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection(AD). Methods: A total of 30 patients with Stanford type B AD who underwent EVAR were collected. A unified follow-up plan was made for all patients. CTA of the aorta was reviewed regularly at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the operation to evaluate the changes of the aorta and postoperative complications. Results: In this study, 30 patients were successfully completed EVAR(100%), 21 males(70%), 9 females(30%), aged 36~68 years, the average age was (51.48±3.55) years, including AD 15 cases in acute phase(50%), 9 cases(30%) in subacute phase, 6 cases(20%) in chronic phase. The average follow-up time after EVAR was (17.31±4.28) months. One case died of aortic rupture within one year after operation, and two cases had internal leakage(1 case in type Ⅰ and 1 case in type Ⅱ). After the operation of AD, the aortic stent segment had the best absorption effect, followed by the distal thoracic aorta segment, and the abdominal aorta segment had the worst effect. Compared with AD patients in the acute and subacute phase, the absorption effect of AD patients in chronic phase was significantly decreased(P<0.05). In patients with AD at different stages after surgery, the true lumen diameter of the aorta was larger and the false lumen was smaller than that before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Compared with AD in the acute phase and subacute phase, the difference between the true lumen diameter and the false lumen diameter in the chronic phase was smaller. The maximum diameter of the vasculature after EVAR in the acute and subacute phase was smaller than that before EVAR, the difference was statistically significant(before operation in acute phase (3.32±0.19) cm, after operation (2.96±0.27) cm, P=0.00, P＜0.05; before operation in subacute phase (3.03±0.28) cm, after operation (2.88±0.37) cm, P=0.04, P<0.05), but the change of the aortic lumen diameter in the chronic phase was not statistically significant(before operation in chronic phase (4.15±0.53) cm, after operation (4.12±0.55) cm, P=0.95, P＞0.05). Conclusion: EVAR in the treatment of Stanford type B AD patients has a certain short-term and medium-term effect, promoting the remodeling of the aortic wall after AD surgery, but the effect of EVAR treatment in AD patients with different phases of aortic wall remodeling is different, the effect of aortic remodeling in chronic phase is the worst.

Key words： Aortic diseases Tomography, X-ray computed Angiography Radiology, interventional

Received: 08 June 2020

PACS:	Ｒ543.1
	Ｒ814.42
	Ｒ814.43
	Ｒ815

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	GAO Xin-hua
	LIU Zhao-yu

Cite this article:

GAO Xin-hua,LIU Zhao-yu. Clinical follow-up study of Stanford type B thoracic aortic dissection with endovascular repair[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 31(8): 534-537.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/10.12117/jccmi.2020.08.002 OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V31/I8/534

[1]Roselli EE, Idrees J, Greenberg RK, et al. Endovascular stent grafting for ascending aorta repair in high-risk patients[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 149(1): 144-151. [2]Macura KJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK, et al. Pathogenesis in acute aortic: aortic dissection intramural hematoma, and aortic ulcer[J]. AJR, 2003, 181(2): 309-316. [3]Goncalves FB, Metz R, Hendriks JM, et al. Decision-making in type-B dissection: current evidence and future perspectives[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg(Torino), 2010, 51(5): 657-667. [4]黄震华. 胸主动脉瘤和胸主动脉夹层治疗进展[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志，2016，35（2）：122-127. [5]Davis AE, Lewandowski AJ, Holloway CJ, et al. Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014, 16(1): 9-17. [6]Appoo JJ, Tse LW, Pozeg ZI, et al. Thoracic aortic frontier: review of current applications and directions of thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2014, 30(1): 52-63. [7]Bhamidipati CM, Ailawadi G. Acute complicated perspective and uncomplicated type Ⅲ aortic dissection: an endovascular[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 21(4): 373-386. [8]赵伯英，赵渝. “烟囱”技术在胸主动脉夹层动脉瘤腔内治疗中的应用[J]. 中国血管外科杂志：电子版，2012，4（2）：98-101. [9]郭伟，张宏鹏，刘小平，等． “烟囱”技术在主动脉弓病变腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志，2010，25（7）：536-539. [10]张一凡. 胸主动脉疾病介入治疗的研究进展[J]. 医学综述，2016，22（11）：2168-2171. [11]Patterson B, Holt P, Nienaber C, et al． Aortic pathology determines midterm outcome after endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: report from the Medtronic Thoracic Endovascular Ｒegistry(MOTH-ER) database[J]. Circulation, 2013, 127(1): 24-32. [12]Canaud L, Ozdemir BA, Patterson BO, et al. Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. J Ann Surg, 2014, 260(2): 389-395. [13]庞桦进. 复杂型急性B型主动脉夹层腔内修复术后主动脉重塑的形态学观察及其对患者长期的生存影响[D]. 南方医科大学，2019. [14]李栋林，张鸿坤，李鸣. Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内修复术后主动脉重塑与夹层形态学理论建立[J]. 中华普通外科杂志，2015，30（11）：920-922.