孕期与非孕期宫颈组织应变超声弹性成像参数对比研究

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2019.11.008

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (17)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To explore the application value of strain cervical elastography in the characteristics of cervical softness during pregnancy and non-pregnancy. Methods: Forty pregnant women who received prenatal examination in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from November 2017 to October 2018 were selected and divided into two groups: group 1 (20 cases, 20~24 weeks), group 2(20 cases, 28~34 weeks) and 20 non-pregnant women were included as control. Five cervical elasticity indexes were obtained by strain elastography: entire cervical strain rate(CS); closed internal cervical os strain rate(CIS); external cervical os strain rate(ES); the midpoint of the cervical canal strain rate(CCS); anterior lip of the cervical strain rate(ACS). One-way ANOVA was used in the normal data and LSD-t test was used in the two groups. Kruskal-Wallis test was used in multi-group for the non-normal data. Results: CS, ES and CCS in pregnancy group were significantly higher than those in non-pregnancy group. However, there was no significant difference of those between pregnancy groups. ACS in group 1 was significantly higher than group 2 and non-pregnancy group. Especially, CIS indicated no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion: Cervical strain elastography may objectively show the characteristics of cervical tissue that changed during pregnancy. Closed internal cervical os tissue may not be soften before 34 weeks and the rest regions of cervical tissue probably had begun to be soften before 20 weeks of gestation. Those characteristics may give a hand for predicting or monitoring the premature delivery and other cervical lesions.

Key words： Cervix uteri Pregnant women Ultrasonography, Doppler, color

Received: 20 December 2018

PACS:	Ｒ714.14
	Ｒ445.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Jing-hua
	WU Qing-qing
	ZHANG Li-na
	LIANG Na
	WANG Jing-jing

Cite this article:

LI Jing-hua,WU Qing-qing,ZHANG Li-na, et al. Assessment of cervical softness using strain elastography in pregnant and in non-pregnant women[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 30(11): 795-798.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/10.12117/jccmi.2019.11.008 OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V30/I11/795

[1]Qiu T, Wang H, Song J, et al. Could ultrasound elastography reflect liver function[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44(4): 779-785. [2]Dong YJ, Zhou C, Zhou JQ, et al. Breast strain elastography: observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 101(4): 157-161. [3]朱桂敏，吴玉莲，陆永萍，等. 实时剪切波弹性成像技术对不同年龄段正常乳腺硬度的定量研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2018，29（4）：295-297. [4]梁平，姜玉新. 超声E成像临床应用指南[M]. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2018：2-25. [5]Xie M, Zhang X, Yu M, et al. Evaluation of the cervix after cervical conization by transvaginal elastography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(5): 1109-1114. [6]高敏，史铁梅，张原溪，等. 超声弹性成像在子宫内膜病变中的研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2018，34（5）：783-786. [7]Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology[J]. Eur J Ultrasound, 2013, 34(2): 169-184. [8]Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(5): 1126-1147. [9]Arrigo F, Edoardo M, Helen F, et al. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations[J]. J Med Ultrasonics, 2016, 43(4): 493-504. [10]Yao W, Gan Y, Myers KM, et al. Collagen fiber orientation and dispersion in the upper cervix of non-pregnant and pregnant women[J]. PLOS One, 2016, 11(11): e0166709. [11]Hernandez-Andrade E, Garcia M, Ahn H, et al. Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at ≤34 weeks of gestation[J]. J Perinat Med, 2015, 43(6): 657-666. [12]Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Joon P, et al. Fetal adrenal gland biometry and cervical elastography as predictors of preterm birth: A comparative study[J]. Ultrasound, 2018, 26(1): 54-62. [13]李菁华，吴青青，高凤云，等. 经阴道超声实时宫颈组织弹性成像技术预测早产风险的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2017，14（12）：933-937. [14]Li Jh, Zhang LN，Wu QQ，et al. Assessment of the cervix using strain elastography in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm birth[J]. Adv Ultrasound Diagn Therapy, 2018, 2(8): 106-112. [15]Thomas A. Imaging of the cervix using sono-elastography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(3): 356-357. [16]Hernandez-Andrade E, Maymon E, Luewan S, et al. A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18-24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery[J]. J Perinat Med, 2018, 46(5): 489-501. [17]Nupur S, Anita K. Strain cervical elastography in pregnancy: feasibility study and its usefulness in prediction of preterm birth[J]. J Fetal Med, 2018, 5(3): 155-158.