滤波反投影与迭代算法的图像质量及左心室功能评价准确性的比较研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：比较滤波反投影（Filtered back projection，FBP）与迭代算法（Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction，SAFIRE）的图像质量及左心室功能评价的准确性。材料与方法：纳入我院先后3天内行冠状动脉CT检查和心脏MR检查者82例为研究对象，分别采用FBP和SAFIRE重建系列图像。将82例按照体质量指数（BMI）分成A组（BMI≤24 kg/m2，共30例）和B组（BMI＞24 kg/m2，共52例），测量主动脉根部及皮下脂肪组织CT值及标准差，计算图像信噪比（SNR）和对比噪声（CNR），分别比较两个BMI组不同重建方法的图像质量。利用心功能分析软件测量两种重建图像的左心室舒张末期容积（EDV）、收缩末期容积（ESV）、每搏输出量（SV）和射血分数（EF），并以MRI心功能测量结果作为金标准，对比分析两种重建方法评价左心室功能的准确性。统计分析采用配对t检验和Pearson相关分析。结果：A组和B组SAFIRE重建图像噪声分别下降18.98%和17.40%，SNR和CNR分别提高23.99%、32.54%和22.07%、31.73%，差异均有显著的统计学意义（P＜0.001）。与MRI相比较，两种重建算法测得的左心室EDV、ESV、SV和EF值均无统计学差异（P＞0.05），经Pearson相关分析，两种重建方法与MRI的结果均具有相关性。结论：SAFIRE重建较FBP重建可提高图像质量。两组重建方法测量左心室功能与MRI均具有相关性，SAFIRE重建图像测量结果更为准确。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李佩玲
	蒋娜
	赵宇
	赵丽
	李松柏

关键词 ：心室功能, 左；体层摄影术, X线计算机；血管造影术

Abstract：Objective: To compare the image quality and the accuracy of contrast computed tomography(CT) for left ventricular function assessment between sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction(SAFIRE) and filtered back projection(FBP). Methods: A total of 82 patients prospectively underwent cardiac examination with Dual-source CT and MRI(as reference standard) within 3 days. All CT images were reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE techniques, respectively. All patients were divided into group A(BMI≤24 kg/m2, n=30) and group B(BMI＞24 kg/m2, n=52). The CT values and standard deviations of aorta and subcutaneous fat tissue were measured and SNRs and CNRs were calculated. Image quality was assessed for both reconstruction techniques. From these two different reconstruction images, ESV, EDV, SV and EF were determined using the Simpson’s method and compared with MRI. Paired-t test and Pearson’s correlation were used for statistical analysis. Results: The image noises on SAFIRE images decreased by 18.98% and 17.40% and SNRs/CNRs increased by 23.99%/32.54%(group A) and 22.07%/31.73%(group B) compared with FBP images, respectively(all P<0.001). There was no significantly overestimation and underestimation of EDV, ESV, SV and EF by FBP and SAFIRE compared to MRI(all P>0.05), respectively. All LV function measurements of CT images showed statistically intraclass correlations with MRI. Conclusion: SAFIRE may improve image quality. LV function measurements acquired by SAFIRE and FBP image data sets all were statistically related to MRI. The LV function results derived by SAFIRE images were more accurate.

Key words： Ventricular function, left Tomography, X-ray computed Angiography

收稿日期: 2015-03-03

PACS:	Ｒ541
	Ｒ814.42
	Ｒ814.43

基金资助:辽宁省自然科学基金资助项目（项目编号2014021072）。

引用本文:

李佩玲，蒋娜，赵宇，赵丽，李松柏. 滤波反投影与迭代算法的图像质量及左心室功能评价准确性的比较研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2015, 26(12): 869-872.
LI Pei-ling, JIANG Na, ZHAO Yu, ZHAO Li, LI Song-bai. Comparative study of image quality and accuracy of evaluation of left ventricular function between sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 26(12): 869-872.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2015/V26/I12/869

[1]熊复，余更生. 三维超声心动图在心功能评价中的应用现状[J]. 心血管病学进展，2007，28（3）：409-412.
[2]Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, et al. Raw-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(12): 2521-2526.
[3]Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 199(1): 8-18.
[4]Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, et al. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection[J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68(3): 272-278.
[5]Rivers-Bowerman MD, Shankar JJ. Iterative Reconstruction for Head CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality[J]. Can J Neurol, 2014, 41(5): 620-625.
[6]Kalra MK, Woisetschlager M, Dahlstrom N, et al. Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction of low-dose chest CT: effect on image quality and radiation dose[J]. AJR, 2013, 201(2): W235-244.
[7]王晋军，李建丁. 64层螺旋CT定量评估左心功能的方法研究[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志，2010，8（10）：1184-1185.
[8]de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Assessment of global left ventricular function and volumes with 320-row multidetector computed tomography: A comparison with 2D-echocardiography[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2009, 17(2): 225-231.
[9]Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multi-detector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging[J]． Invest Radiol, 2003, 38(10): 653-661.
[10]Mahnken AH, Spüntrup E, Wildberger JE, et al. Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI[J]. Rofo, 2003, 175(1): 83-88.
[11]赵希刚，李坤成，杜祥颖，等. 64排螺旋增强CT法评价左室心功能与屏气MR电影法的比较研究[J]. 中华医学杂志，2006，86（37）：2723-2725.