Abstract：Objective: To assess the combination of superb micro-vascular imaging(SMI) and BI-RADS-US classification in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: This study included 136 patients with 174 breast tumors, all patients enrolled in the joint application of SMI and BI-RADS-US classification examination for diagnosis confirmed by pathology finally. Results: The Alder scale from 0～Ⅲ accounted for benign and malignant tumors by SMI were 88.78%(87/98), 8.16%(8/98), 2.04%(2/98), 1.02%(1/98) and 1.32%(1/76), 9.21%(7/76), 61.84%(47/76), 27.63%(21/76), respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05)． The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of BI-RADS-US alone and SMI with BI-RADS-US was 77.63%, 83.67%, 61.30% and 94.74%, 91.84%, 86.58%. The combination of SMI and BI-RADS-US was superior to BI-RADS-US alone, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: The combination of SMI and BI-RADS-US is more effective method for evaluating the diagnostic value of breast cancer than BI-RADS-US alone, having comparatively higher value for clinical application．
王 帅. SMI联合BI-RADS-US分类在乳腺癌诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2020, 31(6): 403-405.
WANG Shuai. Application value of superb micro-vascular imaging combined BI-RADS-US classification in the diagnosis of breast cancer. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 31(6): 403-405.
[1]Mahadevappa R, Neves H, Yuen SM, et al. DNA replication licensing protein MCM10 promotes tumor progression and is a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in breast cancer[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2018, 10(9): 282.
[2]师金，梁迪，李道娟，等. 全球女性乳腺癌流行情况研究[J]. 中国肿瘤，2017，26（9）：683-690.
[3]张秉宜，张郁林，韩玲，等. 高频彩超及X线钼靶检查对乳腺原位癌早期诊断价值的对照分析[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2015，26（1）：14-17.
[4]Yongfeng Z, Ping Z, Wengang L, et al. Application of a novel microvascular imaging technique in breast lesion evaluation[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(9): 2097-2105.
[5]Xiao XY, Chen X, Guan XF, et al. Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: A comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging[J]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89(1066): 20160546.
[6]Feng Q, Zhang C, Lum D, et al. A class of extracellular vesicles from breast cancer cells activates VEGF receptors and tumor angiogenesis[J]. Nat Commum, 2017, 8: 14450.
[7]Park AY, Seo BK, Cha SH, et al. An innovative ultrasound technique for evaluation of tumor vascularity in breast cancers: superb micro-vascular imaging[J]. Breast Cancer, 2016, 19(2): 210-213.
[8]Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: Preliminary findings[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559.
[9]郝少云，欧冰，钟文景，等. 弹性成像对新版BI-RADS-US评估乳腺肿物良恶性的价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志，2015，31（4）：292-295.
[10]江泽飞. 乳腺癌治疗决策：从个体化治疗到精准医学[J]. 中国实用外科杂志，2015，35（7）：697-700.
[11]谭景胜，王世华，杜文华. 彩色多普勒超声在乳腺小结节鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 重庆医学，2012，41（33）：3496-3497.
[12]余丽惠，罗葆明. 超声诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2015，31（5）：793-796.
[13]曹小丽，刘瑞华，刘美娟，等. 乳腺癌患者超声造影表现及其与微血管密度的关系[J]. 中华医学超声杂志：电子版，2013，10（7）：590-595.
[14]Liu Y, Cheng HD, Huang JH, et al． Computer aided diagnosis system for breast cancer based on color Doppler flow imaging[J]. J Med Syst, 2012, 36(6): 3975-3982．
[15]董维露，谭旭艳，王文平，等. 剪切波弹性成像联合超微血流成像对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志，2019，11（2）：107-109.
[16]Zhan J, Diao XH, Jin JM, et al. Superb microvascular Imaging-A new vascular detecting ultrasonographic technique for avascular breast masses: A preliminary study[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(5): 915-921．
[17]刁雪红，陈悦，詹嘉，等. 多模式超声血流成像技术在乳腺肿块内穿支血管中的应用[J]. 中国超声医学杂志，2016，32（8）：752-754.
