T2WI灰阶比值在肾透明细胞癌和乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤鉴别诊断中的价值

doi:10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.010

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨T2WI灰阶比值对肾透明细胞癌（Clear cell renal cell carcinoma，CCRCC）和乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤（Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat，AMLmf）鉴别诊断的价值。方法：回顾分析经手术病理证实的最大径≤4.0 cm的46例46枚CCRCC与32例35枚AMLmf的T2WI图像，通过RADinfo阅片系统灰阶直方图软件，测量并计算肾脏肿瘤/肾皮质和肿瘤/脾实质的灰阶比值。通过受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线获得鉴别CCRCC与AMLmf最佳比值的阈值。结果：46枚CCRCC和35枚AMLmf中，瘤/肾比值、瘤/脾比值分别为（1.021±0.206）与（0.710±0.159）（t=7.420，P<0.001）、（1.634±0.331）与（1.140±0.272）（t=3.889，P<0.001）。瘤/肾比值、瘤/脾比值诊断CCRCC的曲线下面积和最佳阈值分别为0.891和0.904、0.817和1.123，相应的敏感度和特异度分别为76.1%和91.4%、87.0%和71.4%。随着两个比值的升高，诊断CCRCC的敏感度减低，特异度升高。两者联合的敏感度为69.6%，特异度为94.3%。结论：T2WI灰阶比值能客观、准确以及定量地鉴别CCRCC和AMLmf，瘤/肾比值具有较高的特异度，瘤/脾比值有较高的敏感度，联合两者比值鉴别诊断则具有更高的特异度，减少误诊率的发生。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张丽青
	韩志江
	赖旭峰

关键词 ：肾肿瘤, 血管肌脂瘤, 磁共振成像, 诊断, 鉴别

Abstract：Objective: To investigate the value of T2WI grayscale ratio in the differential diagnosis of small clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC) and angiomyolipoma with minimal fat(AMLmf). Methods: T2WI data of 46 cases surgical which pathological comfirmed CCRCC and 32 cases of proven 35 AMLmf the diameter ≤4.0 cm were restrospectively analyzed. The grayscale value of renal tumor to kidney cortex and tumor to spleen were measured and calculated by RADinfo Reading System. The threshold value of the optimal ratio to identify CCRCC and AMLmf was obtained through the ROC curve. Results: In 46 CCRCC and 35 AMLmf, the tumor/kidney ratio and tumor/spleen ratio were 1.021±0.206 and 0.710±0.159(t=7.420, P<0.001), 1.634±0.331 and 1.140±0.272(t=3.889, P<0.001), respectively. The area under the curves and optimal threshold of tumor/kidney ratio and tumor/spleen ratio in the identification of CCRCC and CCRCC respectively were 0.891 and 0.904, 0.817 and 1.123, respectively. And the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 76.1% and 91.4%, 87.0% and 71.4%. While these ratios were increasing, the sensitivity to diagnose CCRCC decreases and the specificity increases. In combination with tumor/kidney ratio and tumor/spleen ratio, the sensitivity and specificity were 69.6% and 94.3%. Conclusion: T2WI grayscale ratio can identify CCRCC and AMLmf objectively, accurately and quantitatively. The tumor/kidney ratio has a high specificity, and the tumor/spleen ratio has a high sensitivity. The combination of the two ratios has higher specificity, which reduce the incidence of misdiagnosis.

Key words： Kidney neoplasms Angiomyolipoma Magnetic resonance imaging Diagnosis, differential

收稿日期: 2019-08-22

PACS:	Ｒ737.11
	Ｒ730.262
	Ｒ445.2

通讯作者: 韩志江，浙江大学附属杭州市第一人民医院放射科，310006。E-mail：hzjsyy@126.com

作者简介: 张丽青（1990-），女，浙江义乌人，主治医师。E-mail：570869321@qq.com

引用本文:

张丽青，韩志江，赖旭峰. T2WI灰阶比值在肾透明细胞癌和乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2020, 31(5): 346-349.
ZHANG Li-qing, HAN Zhi-jiang, LAI Xu-feng. The value of T2WI grayscale ratio in the differentiation of clear cell renal carcinoma from angiomyolipoma with minimal fat. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 31(5): 346-349.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/10.12117/jccmi.2020.05.010 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V31/I5/346

[1]张丽青，韩志江. 最大径≤3 cm的乏脂肪肾脏血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾透明细胞癌的MRI鉴别[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2019，38（1）：132-135.
[2]张丽青，韩志江，陈文辉，等. MRI灰阶比值在肾乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与透明细胞癌鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2019，38（5）：101-104.
[3]Schieda N, Dilauro M, Moosavi B, et al. MRI evaluation of small(<4 cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(7): 2242-2251.
[4]Lim RS, Flood TA, Mcinnes MDF, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(2): 542-553.
[5]Yano M, Fowler KJ, Srisuwan S, et al. Quantitative multiparametric MR analysis of small renal lesions: correlation with surgical pathology[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2018, 43(12): 3390-3399.
[6]苗燕平，高阳，曹鹏. 定量动态增强MRI对肾透明细胞癌及乏脂肪肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 磁共振成像，2015，6（8）：599-602.
[7]Zhang HM, Wu YH, Gan Q, et al. Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Small Solid Renal Tumors(≤4 cm) at 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J]. Chin Med J, 2015, 128(11): 1444-1449.
[8]Catalano OA, Samir AE, Sahani DV, et al. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?[J]. Radiology, 2008, 247(3): 738-746.
[9]Kim Y, Sung DJ, Sim KC, et al. Renal tumors with low signal intensities on T2-weighted MR image: radiologic-pathologic correlation[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2017, 42(8): 2108-2118.
[10]Chung MS, Choi HJ, Kim MH, et al. Comparison of T2-Weighted MRI With and Without Fat Suppression for Differentiating Renal Angiomyolipomas Without Visible Fat From Other Renal Tumors[J]. AJR, 2014, 202(4): 765-771.
[11]Schieda N, Lim RS, McInnes MDF, et al. Characterization of small(<4 cm) solid renal masses by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: Current evidence and further development[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2018, 99(7-8): 443-455.
[12]Sasiwimonphan K, Takahashi N, Leibovich BC, et al. Small (<4 cm) Renal Mass: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma Utilizing MR Imaging[J]. Radiology, 2012, 263(1): 160-168.
[13]Park JJ, Kim CK. Small(<4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma[J]. AJR, 2017, 208(1): 124-130.
[14]Choi HJ, Kim JK, Ahn H, et al. Value of T2-weighted MR imaging in differentiating low-fat renal angiomyolipomas from other renal tumors[J]. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52(3): 349-353.
[15]Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Can It Be Differentiated from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using Standard MR Techniques?[J]. Radiology, 2012, 265(2): 468-477.