|
|
The value of uterine arcuate artery blood-flow parameters in diagnosing placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta by transabdominal ultrasound |
HAN Rui-zheng, LI He-zhou, LIU Yun, ZHOU Chang-rong, WANG Run-li, LI Chun-ling, ZHANG Jun-ling |
Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the potential value of uterine arcuate artery blood-flow parameters in diagnosing placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta. Methods: 64 pregnant women in the third trimester with placenta previa who underwent ultrasound examination in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to January 2017 were adopted. All cases underwent uterine arcuate artery Doppler velocimetry to measure the peak systolic maximum velocity(PSV), resistance index(RI) and pulsatility index(PI). The patients were divided into two groups according to the operation results. Statistical analysis of PSV, RI and PI were performed to confirm the optimum boundary points of the indices. Results: The PSV of uterine arcuate artery was higher(P<0.001) while RI and PI was lower(P=0.01, P=0.03) in the placenta accreta group compared to previa alone. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of PSV of uterine arcuate artery was high while RI and PI was moderate and the optimum boundary points was 39.33 cm/s, 0.385 and 0.51. Conclusion: The PSV, RI, PI of the uterine arcuate artery is of definite value in the diagnosis of placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta.
|
Received: 15 August 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Cite this article: |
HAN Rui-zheng,LI He-zhou,LIU Yun, et al. The value of uterine arcuate artery blood-flow parameters in diagnosing placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta by transabdominal ultrasound[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 29(5): 348-350.
|
|
|
|
URL: |
http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V29/I5/348 |
[1]何惠丽,王英英. 多种超声联合扫查在胎盘植入诊断中的应用[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2016,27(6):419-422.
[2]刘艳. 侵入性胎盘的发病原因及病理学、分子生物学特征[J]. 山东医药,2015,55(35):100-102.
[3]李玉新,王振香. 育龄女性子宫弓状动脉多普勒频谱正常波形及参考值研究[J]. 天津医药,2012,5(40):477-479.
[4]种轶文,张爱青,王妍,等. 超声评分系统预测胎盘植入凶险程度的价值[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(9):705-709.
[5]韩鹏慧,江魁明,郭庆禄,等. 超声及在胎盘植入中的诊断价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2016,27(3):194-197.
[6]Cho HY, Hwang HS. Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta by Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry in Patients With Placenta Previa[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34(9): 1571-1575.
[7]彭软,谢红宁,杨建波,等. 胎盘植入的产前超声诊断及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志,2010,21(6):67-69.
[8]Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Placenta Accreta[J]. Obstet Gynaecol, 2012, 2012(2012): 1-7.
[9]Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta[J]. Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 121(2): 171-182.
[10]Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: Pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease[J]. Placenta, 2012, 33(4): 244-251. |
|
|
|