多参数磁共振成像VI-RADS评分对膀胱癌肌层浸润诊断价值的初步研究

doi:DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2019.08.010

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To investigate interobserver agreement and diagnosis value of multiparametric MRI(mp-MRI) using vesical imaging-reporting and data system(VI-RADS) in detecting muscle-invasiveness of bladder cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 99 patients(109 tumors in total) with pathologically confirmed bladder cancer was made in this study. The tumors was classified as non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC) with stage T1 or lower and muscle invasive bladder cancer(MIBC) with stage T2 or higher. The mp-MRI images of tumors were scored by two radiologists independently with blind method by using VI-RADS. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using Kappa test. Receivers operating characteristic(ROC) curves were used to describe the diagnostic efficiency of two radiologists. Results: Interobserver agreement of VI-RADS was good(Kappa value=0.721, P<0.001). According to ROC analysis, VI-RADS score 4 was found to be the best cut-off levels for discriminating NMIBC from MIBC by two radiologists, with the AUC of 0.912 and 0.925, the sensitivity of 76.2% and 71.4%, the specificity of 95.5% and 95.5%, the positive predictive value of 80.0% and 79.0%, the negative predictive value of 94.4% and 93.3%, respectively． Conclusion: The VI-RADS shows good consistency and stability for evaluation bladder cancer. Futhermore, VI-RADS demonstrates a good accuracy in the detection of muscle-invasiveness of bladder cancer, and provides a high specificity and negative predictive value.

Key words： Bladder neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging

Received: 23 August 2018

PACS:	Ｒ737.14
	Ｒ445.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Tian-hui
	GU Zhi-cong
	YAO Chun
	ZHU Wen-biao
	CHENG Ya-bao
	ZHANG Wen-ju
	FENG Zhi-qiang
	FAN Wei-xiong

Cite this article:

ZHANG Tian-hui,GU Zhi-cong,YAO Chun, et al. Diagnostic value of multiparametric MRI using vesical imaging reporting and data system in detecting muscle-invasiveness of bladder cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 30(8): 569-573.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2019.08.010 OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V30/I8/569

[1]Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(3): 447-461. [2]Alfred WJ, Lebret T, Comperat EM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(3): 462-475. [3]Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, et al. Diagnostic performance of MRI for prediction of muscle-invasiveness of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 95: 46-55. [4]Panebianco V, Narumi Y, Altun E, et al. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS(Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System)[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 74(3): 294-306. [5]韩苏军，张思维，陈万青，等. 中国膀胱癌发病现状及流行趋势分析[J]. 癌症进展，2013，11（1）：89-95. [6]Huang L, Kong Q, Liu Z, et al. The Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in Differentiating T Staging of Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Radiology, 2018, 286(2): 502-511. [7]El KM, Lalonde L, David J, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(1): 71-76. [8]Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(1): 16-40. [9]Cerny M, Bergeron C, Billiard JS, et al. LI-RADS for MR Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Performance of Major and Ancillary Features[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(1): 118-128. [10]Thoeny HC, Bellin M, Comperat E, et al. Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System(VI-RADS): Added Value for Management of Bladder Cancer Patients?[J]. Eur Urol, 2018, 74(3): 307-308. [11]Kobayashi S, Koga F, Yoshida S, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(10): 2178-2186. [12]Ghafoori M, Shakiba M, Ghiasi A, et al. Value of MRI in local staging of bladder cancer[J]. Urol J, 2013, 10(2): 866-872. [13]Wang HJ, Pui MH, Guo Y, et al. Multiparametric 3-T MRI for differentiating low-versus high-grade and category T1 versus T2 bladder urothelial carcinoma[J]. AJR, 2015, 204(2): 330-334. [14]Wu LM, Chen XX, Xu JR, et al. Clinical value of T2-weighted imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: a large-scale, multiobserver prospective study on 3.0-T MRI[J]. Acad Radiol, 2013, 20(8): 939-946. [15]Rosenkrantz AB, Haghighi M, Horn J, et al. Utility of quantitative MRI metrics for assessment of stage and grade of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: preliminary results[J]. AJR, 2013, 201(6): 1254-1259. [16]Panebianco V, De Berardinis E, Barchetti G, et al. An evaluation of morphological and functional multi-parametric MRI sequences in classifying non-muscle and muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(9): 3759-3766.