卵巢冠囊肿穿刺介入治疗与腹腔镜治疗的疗效观察对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To observe the clinical effect between the interventional treatment and the laparoscopic treatment of parovarian cyst. Methods: Eighty-nine patients with parovarian cyst were treated with laparoscopic treatment(51 cases) and intervention treatment(38 cases) in our hospital. The curative effect, operative time, postoperative infection and recovery were compared between the two treatment methods. Results: The following results were obtained by comparing the operation condition of two groups. The cure rate and the recurrence rate of two treatments had no significant differences(P>0.05). The operative time and length of hospital stay and health care costs of laparoscopic treatment were basically two times of that of targeted interventional treatment. The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions of laparoscopic treatment was 34.85%, and the interventional therapy was 8.12%, there was a significant difference(P=0.006). Conclusion: Compared with laparoscopic treatment, the operation time, hospitalization time, health care costs of interventional treatment were lower, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was significantly lower than that of laparoscopic treatment.

Key words： Ovarian cysts Laparoscopy Ultrasonography, interventional

Received: 15 January 2016

PACS:	Ｒ711.75
	Ｒ445.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Wu-ping

Cite this article:

ZHANG Wu-ping. Comparison of curative effects between interventional treatment and laparoscopic treatment of parovarian cyst[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 27(10): 736-738.

URL:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.jccmi.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V27/I10/736

[1]Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Koniaris LG, et al. A population-based analysis of 1 037 malignant ovarian tumors in the pediatric population[J]. J Surg Res, 2009, 156(1): 45-49.
[2]林月. 综合护理干预对腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿患者的效果评价[J]. 中国实用护理杂志，2011，27（15）：29-30.
[3]胡辉权，彭勇，龙琼先. 1 026例卵巢囊肿的临床病理分析[J]. 西部医学，2012，24（5）：888-890.
[4]高红梅. 腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在妇科应用上的临床对比[D]. 大连：大连医科大学，2010.
[5]Hesham SA, Hassan HM, Dalal EM, et al. Assessment of the ovarian reserve before and after laparoscopic surgery using two different techniques for ovarian endometrioma[J]. IOSR J Dent Med Sci, 2013, 6(5): 43-48.
[6]张永兴. 卵巢囊肿的中医临床研究[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志，2013，20（2）：111-112.
[7]王建设. 卵巢囊肿的辨治经验[J]. 中医杂志，2009，50（增刊）：72-73.
[8]Abdelmgid SM, Mahmoud CA, Ahmed HM, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas: cystectomy versus fenestration and coagulation[J]. ZUMJ, 2013, 19(3): 370-376.
[9]Rajeshwari BG, Dhulked S, Ramachandran A, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy of endometrioma: Good surgical technique does not adversely affect ovarian reserve[J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2014, 7(2): 125-129.
[10]Muzii L, Dich T, Dim F, et al. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(10): 2190-2198.
[11]Biacchiardi PCH, Piane DL, Camanni M, et al. Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas negatively affects ovarian follicular reserve even performed by experienced surgeons[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011, 23(6): 740-746.
[12]马锦霞，刘存芬，赵珍. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗卵巢囊肿的临床比较[J]. 昆明医科大学学报，2012，33（9）：81-84.
[13]陈建权，吴蕾，李彤. 超声介入与腹腔镜下治疗卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的疗效对比[J]. 武警后勤学院学报：医学版，2013，22（6）：476-478.
[14]杨琳娜，徐琳，敬晓涛. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效比较[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志，2009，14（5）：389-391.
[15]莫专萍. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗卵巢囊肿的疗效比较[J]. 广西医学，2012，34（3）：321-323.
[16]朱慧玲. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗良性卵巢囊肿的疗效及经济学比较[J]. 医学临床研究，2008，25（8）：1429-1431.