MR扩散峰度成像在鉴别高级别胶质瘤与转移瘤中的价值

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：探讨磁共振扩散峰度成像（DKI）中的多个参数（MK值、MD值和FA值）在鉴别脑内原发性高级别胶质瘤与单发脑实质内转移瘤的价值。方法：收集2013年1月—2015年5月在我院就诊并经病理确诊的高级别胶质瘤13例，颅内单发转移瘤12例。所有患者均采用常规MRI序列及DKI序列，在肿瘤实质部分及肿瘤周围水肿区分别设置感兴趣区，测量其MK值、MD值和FA值，并与对侧正常脑白质进行标准化校正处理，得到相应标准化参数值MK’值、MD’值、FA’值，采用独立样本t检验对高级别胶质瘤、转移瘤两组中实质区和瘤周区的DKI各参数值进行统计学分析。结果：高级别胶质瘤的肿瘤实质区和瘤周区MK值、MD值和FA值分别为0.84±0.21、（1.28±.30）×10-3 mm2/s、0.26±0.17；1.19±0.26、（1.07±0.22）×10-3 mm2/s、0.28±0.12。颅内不典型转移瘤的肿瘤实质区和瘤周区的MK值、MD值和FA值分别为0.80±0.20、（1.48±0.45）×10-3 mm2/s、0.17±0.12；0.86±0.18、（1.54±0.46）×10-3 mm2/s、0.22±0.14。肿瘤实质区的DKI参数值在胶质瘤和转移瘤间差异无统计学意义，瘤周区MK值和MD值在两者间差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05），FA值差异无统计学意义。矫正后的MK’值、MD’值在瘤周区两种肿瘤间具有明显差异（P均<0.01），其他矫正后参数均未发现统计学差异。结论：瘤周水肿区MK值、MD值在鉴别高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤中具有重要的价值。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘培政
	沈晓君
	李军
	耿军祖

关键词 ：神经胶质瘤, 脑肿瘤, 磁共振成像

Abstract：Abstract: Objective: To investigate the value of magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging(DKI) in differential diagnosis of intracerebral primary high-grade gliomas and single intracerebral metastasis tumor through multiple parameters including MK value, MD value and FA value. Methods: Thirteen cases of high-grade gliomas and 12 cases of single intracerebral metastasis tumors confirmed by pathology were collected from January 2013 to May 2015. All patients underwent conventional MRI sequences and DKI sequence. Region of interest was located at both the solid area and the surrounding edema zone of the tumors respectively, and MK, MD, FA values were measured. Standardized corrections were performed for contralateral normal brain white matter. Then corresponding standard parameters of MK’, MD’, and FA’ values were obtained. Independent samples t test was performed to compare DKI parameters of both solid area and edema region for high grade gliomas and metastasis tumors. Results: MK, MD and FA values in the solid area and surrounding region of high grade glioma tumor were 0.84±0.21, (1.28±.30)×10-3 mm2/s, 0.26±0.17; 1.19±0.26, (1.07±0.22)×10-3 mm2/s, 0.28±0.12 respectively. The DKI values of above-mentioned regions of intracranial atypical metastases were 0.80±0.20, (1.48±0.45)×10-3 mm2/s, 0.17±0.12; 0.86±0.18, (1.54±0.46)×10-3 mm2/s, 0.22±0.14 respectively. There was no statistical difference for DKI parameters of the solid region between gliomas and metastasis. There was significant difference for MK and MD values of the surrounding region between gliomas and metastasis(P<0.05), however there was no significant difference for the FA value. After the correction, there was significant difference for the MK’, MD’ values of surrounding region between two kinds of tumors(P<0.01), and there was no statistical difference for other corrected parameters. Conclusion: The MK and MD values of surrounding edema region have important value in differential diagnosis of high-grade gliomas and cerebral metastasis.

Key words： Glima Brain neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging

收稿日期: 2015-06-09

PACS:	Ｒ739.41
	Ｒ730.264
	Ｒ445.2

引用本文:

刘培政，沈晓君，李军，耿军祖. MR扩散峰度成像在鉴别高级别胶质瘤与转移瘤中的价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2015, 26(12): 841-843.
LIU Pei-zheng, SHEN Xiao-jun, LI Jun, GENG Jun-zu. The value of magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging in differential diagnosis of high grade gliomas and metastatic tumor. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 26(12): 841-843.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2015/V26/I12/841

[1]Falangola MF, Jensen JH, Tabesh A, et al. Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI assessment of brain microstructure in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 31(6): 840-846.
[2]De Santis S, Assaf Y, Jones DK. Using the biophysical CHARMED model to elucidate the underpinnings of contrast in diffusional kurtosis analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI[J]. MAGMA, 2012, 25(4): 267-276.
[3]范兵，杜华睿，王霄英，等. 转运常数（Ktrans）对高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志，2014，（4）：557-560.
[4]丁庆国，陈振湖，陆永明，等. 弥散张量成像（DTI）在胶质瘤分级中的应用价值初探[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志，2007，5（2）：10-11.
[5]李子孝，戴建平，江涛，等. 脑胶质瘤术前3.0T磁共振弥散张量成像分级[J]. 中国医学影像技术，2009，25（12）：2201-2204.
[6]吴雪斌，张伟国，谭勇，等. 磁共振灌注及波谱成像在鉴别高级别胶质瘤和转移瘤中的应用[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2010，21（6）：381-384.
[7]于昊，王显龙，冯吕金，等. 应用MRI鉴别诊断高级别胶质瘤与单发脑转移瘤的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志，2014，30（19）：3192-3194.
[8]郝金钢，曹洪明，白鹏，等. DWI在脑转移瘤和恶性胶质瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 昆明医科大学学报，2014，35（11）：71-75.
[9]王国华，范海芸，宋修峰，等. 3.0T 1H-MRS在脑内高级别星形细胞瘤及单发转移瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志，2014，12（5）：460-462.
[10]谭艳，张辉，王效春，等. 磁共振扩散峰度成像在脑星形细胞瘤分级的初步研究[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志，2014，12（11）：1351-1352.
[11]黄海燕，田兄玲，王俭，等. 磁共振成像扩散峰度成像技术对抑郁症患者脑微观结构变化的评估价值[J]. 中国全科医学，2014，17（36）：4386-4391.
[12]Yoshida M, Hori M, Yokoyama K, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging of normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis: preliminary clinical experience[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2013, 31(1): 50-55.
[13]Zhu J, Zhuo C, Qin W, et al. Performances of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in detecting white matter abnormality in schizophrenia[J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2014, 7: 170-176.
[14]Van Cauter S, De Keyzer F, Sima DM, et al. Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2014, 16(7): 1010-1021.