1.5T磁共振表观弥散系数比值对舌癌的诊断价值

doi:DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2020.04.004

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：评价舌部病灶与病灶周围正常腺体表观弥散系数（ADC）的比值对于舌癌的诊断、病理分级、分期的应用价值及相关性。方法：收集2017年3月—2019年3月吉林大学中日联谊医院经手术病理证实的60例舌部病变患者的资料，术前行常规MRI及DWI序列扫描，测量瘤体及瘤体周围正常腺体的ADC值并计算出ADC比值，将其与术后病理结果进行对照分析。结果：①舌癌40例，舌良性病灶20例，舌癌对应的ADC比值为-0.13±0.17，舌良性病灶对应的ADC比值为0.09±0.10，二者比值间差异有统计学意义（t=5.129，P<0.05）。②高分化组的ADC比值为0.02±0.07，中分化组的ADC比值为-0.14±0.17，低分化组的ADC比值为-0.26±0.09，三组间比较差异有统计学意义（F=3.593，P=0.047）。③晚期舌癌组（T3+T4）的ADC比值（-0.20±0.13）低于早期舌癌组（Tis+T1+T2）的ADC比值（0.00±0.17）（t=3.314，P=0.03<0.05），T4与T1及T2比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），其他两两比较无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论：ADC比值能够为舌良恶性病灶的鉴别诊断以及舌癌的病理分级、分期提供参考依据，具有重要的临床指导意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郑雪微1
	丁军1
	刘硕1
	管玉瑶1
	李佟1
	冯艳2
	付卫光2
	于保婷1

关键词 ：舌肿瘤, 磁共振成像

Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the value and correlation of the ratio of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) of tongue lesions and surrounding normal glands in the diagnosis, pathological grading and staging of tongue cancer. Methods: Sixty patients with tongue lesions confirmed by surgical pathology in China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from March 2017 to March 2019 were collected. Routine MRI and DWI scanning were performed before operation, and the ADC values of lesions and surrounding glands were measured and the ADC ratio was calculated. Results: ①There were 40 cases of tongue cancer and 20 cases of tongue benign lesions. The ADC ratio of tongue cancer was -0.13±0.17 and that of tongue benign lesions was 0.09±0.10, and the difference between the two ratios was statistically significant(t=5.129, P<0.05). ②The ADC ratio of the highly differentiated group was 0.02±0.07, the ADC ratio of the moderately differentiated group was -0.14±0.17, and the ADC ratio of the low-differentiated group was -0.26±0.09. There were statistically significant differences among the three groups(F=3.593, P=0.047). ③The ADC ratio of the advanced tongue cancer group(T3+T4) was -0.20±0.13, which was lower than that of the early tongue cancer group(Tis+T1+T2), the ADC ratio of the early tongue cancer group was 0.00±0.17(t=3.314, P=0.03<0.05). The difference between T4 and T1 and T2 was statistically significant(P<0.05), while no significant difference was found in other pairwise comparisons(P>0.05). Conclusion: The apparent diffusion coefficient ratio can provide reference for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tongue lesions and the pathological classification and staging of tongue cancer, and has important clinical significance.

Key words： Tongue neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging

收稿日期: 2019-07-22

PACS:	Ｒ739.86
	Ｒ445.2

基金资助:吉林省卫生与健康技术创新项目（2018J078）。

通讯作者: 丁军，吉林大学中日联谊医院放射线科，130021。E-mail：dingjun69@163.com

作者简介: 郑雪微（1995-），女，吉林人，在读硕士研究生。E-mail：840243826@qq.com

引用本文:

郑雪微1，丁军1，刘硕1，管玉瑶1，李佟1，冯艳2，付卫光2，于保婷1. 1.5T磁共振表观弥散系数比值对舌癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2020, 31(4): 243-247.
ZHENG Xue-wei1, DING Jun1, LIU Shuo1, GUAN Yu-yao1, LI Tong1, FENG Yan2, FU Wei-guang2, YU Bao-ting1. The value of 1.5T MR apparent diffusion coefficient ratio in the diagnosis of tongue cancer. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 31(4): 243-247.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/DOI:10.12117/jccmi.2020.04.004 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V31/I4/243

[1]左志超，张卫，邓文娟，等. ADC比值法对鉴别腮腺良恶性病灶的诊断价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志，2018，37（1）：32-36. [2]廖敏，张立力，柯亚娟，等. 舌癌扩大切除前臂桡侧皮瓣移植修复术的压疮防护策略[J]. 海南医学，2017，28（22）：3773-3776. [3]任振虎，吴汉江. 颈部淋巴结包膜外侵犯的研究现状[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志，2012，28（4）：514-517. [4]孙小雅，严汉兴，贺莎，等. 舌癌多种治疗方式的临床疗效比较[J]. 中南医学科学杂志，2018，46（1）：16-19. [5]鄢灵君，邱宇，陈法，等. 膳食因素与吸烟者和非吸烟者舌癌发病的关系[Ｊ]. 卫生研究，2017，46（2）：189-195. [6]Koo K, Barrowman R, McCullough M, et al. Non-smoking non-drinking elderly females: a clinically distinct subgroup of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients[J]. Int J Oral Max Surg, 2013, 42(8): 929-933. [7]Martínez-Sánchez JM, Sureda X, Fu M, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure at home: assessment by biomarkers and airborne markers[J]. Environ Res, 2014, 133(2): 111-116. [8]Wade J, Smith H, Hankins M, et al. Conducting oral examinations for cancer in general practice: what are the barriers?[J]. Fam Pract, 2010, 27(1): 77-84. [9]裴宇文，杨光明，曾春光，等. 磁共振对舌癌的诊断与分期的作用[J]. 实用癌症杂志，2017，32（9）：1563-1565. [10]Morani AC, Elsayes KM, Liu PS, et al. Abdominal applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Where do we stand[J]. World J Radiol, 2013, 5(3): 68-80. [11]Filli L, Wurnig MC, Luechinger R, et al. Whole-body intravoxel incoherent motion imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(7): 2049-2058. [12]林军，张志炎，郑攀丰，等. MR弥散加权成像表观弥散系数在前列腺疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志，2019，17（2）：50-52. [13]Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, et al． Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 29(5): 1080-1084． [14]高永伟，牛广明，韩晓东． 3．0T磁共振诊断直肠癌ADC值与肿瘤分化程度的相关性分析[J]. 中国医疗前沿，2012，7（6）：7-8． [15]Razek AA. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010, 34(6): 808-815. [16]王亚婷，朱艳，陆洋，等. 表观弥散系数平均值及最小值与肝癌病理学特征的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志，2017，28（11）：805-809.