全模型迭代重建技术在冠状动脉钙化模体扫描中的应用价值研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的：通过对心脏钙化模体常规剂量扫描滤过反投影重建（Filtered back projection，FBP）与不同级别低剂量扫描全模型迭代重建（Iterative model reconstruction，IMR）钙化积分及图像质量的比较，探讨IMR技术降低冠状动脉钙化积分（Coronary artery calcium score，CACS）扫描剂量的能力。材料与方法：以心脏钙化模体作为研究对象，以120 kV、80 mAs结合FBP作为常规剂量组（A组）；低剂量组管电压为120 kV，管电流逐级降为50 mAs、40 mAs、30 mAs、20 mAs，均采用IMR算法，记为B~E组。采用单因素方差分析比较各组总Agatston积分、总体积分数、总质量分数、不同密度组Agatston积分、不同直径组Agatston积分及噪声的差异，两两比较采用Bonferroni法，P<0.05为差异有显著的统计学意义。结果：各组间总Agatston积分、体积分数、质量分数、不同密度亚组及不同直径亚组Agatston积分均未见显著的统计学差异。E组噪声显著大于A组（16.5±2.6 vs 8.77±1.55，P=0.005），A组与B~D组噪声未见显著差异。D组辐射剂量较A组降低了62.41%（（2.53±0.06） mGy vs （6.73±0.23） mGy）。结论：IMR可在低剂量下获得与常规剂量FBP重建相当的CACS值及图像质量，最适低剂量组为D组，120 kV、30 mAs配合IMR算法，其辐射剂量比常规剂量组降低了62.41%。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	谭晶
	侯阳
	郭文力
	高思喆

关键词 ：冠状动脉疾病, 体层摄影术, X线计算机

Abstract：Objective: To determine whether or not IMR with lower tube current could replace FBP with routine tube current, and to find the lowest possible tube current for coronary calcium scanning while maintaining accurate Agatston score, volumn score and mass score using a cadiac phantom. Meterials and Methods: An anthropomorphic thoracic and heart phantom containing 9 calcium-insert columns was used to measure the sum of the Agatston score, volumn score, mass score of the 9 columns, Agatston score of different diameter columns and different density columns. And then these measurements among different current and algorithm groups were compared. Using the measurements of 120 kV, 80 mAs with traditional FBP as gold standard(Group A), the measurements with tube voltage 120 kV, and lower tube current of 50 mAs, 40 mAs, 30 mAs and 20 mAs with IMR algorithm were kept as group B, C, D and E, respectively. Then each measurement was compared with gold standard, with P<0.05 as statistical significance. Result: There was no significant difference between each lower current group and group A. For noise, Group E was significantly higher than Group A(16.5±2.6 vs 8.77±1.55, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between group A and group B~D. The radiation dose of group D was 62.41% lower than that of group A((2.53±0.06) mGy vs (6.73±0.23) mGy). Conclusion: Technology IMR with lower tube current could replace FBP with 80 mAs. The optimal low dose group is group D(IMR with 120 kV, 30 mAs). The scanning dose of group D is 62.41% lower than group A.

Key words： Coronary diseases Tomography, X-ray computed

收稿日期: 2016-06-07

PACS:	Ｒ543.3
	Ｒ814.42

基金资助:辽宁省自然科学基金（2013021076）；2014年辽宁省高等学校创新团队（LT2014017）。

通讯作者: 侯阳，中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科，110004。E-mail：houyang1973@163.com

作者简介: 谭晶（1982-），女，辽宁鞍山人，在读硕士研究生。E-mail：tjdk0052@163.com

引用本文:

谭晶，侯阳，郭文力，高思喆. 全模型迭代重建技术在冠状动脉钙化模体扫描中的应用价值研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2016, 27(12): 867-870.
TAN Jing, HOU Yang, GUO Wen-li, GAO Si-zhe. A study of iterative model reconstruction technology in a cardiac coronary calcium anthropomorphic phantom. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 27(12): 867-870.

链接本文:

http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.jccmi.com.cn/CN/Y2016/V27/I12/867

[1]Payne RA. Cardiovascular risk[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2012, 74(3): 396-410.
[2]Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT. New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages?[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2011, 5(5): 286-292.
[3]Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, et al. A knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm: can super-low-dose cardiac CT be applicable in clinical settings?[J]. Acad Radiol, 2014, 21(1): 104-110.
[4]Halpern EJ, Gingold EL, White H, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality with knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction[J]. Acad Radiol, 2014, 21(6): 805-811.
[5]Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990, 15(4): 827-832.
[6]Matsuura N, Urashima M, Fukumoto W, et al. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2015, 39(1): 119-124.
[7]Blobel J, Mews J, Schuijf JD, et al. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction[J]. Invest Radiol, 2013, 48(12): 857-862.
[8]Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C, et al. CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 29(3): 719-724.
[9]Kurata A, Dharampal A, Dedic A, et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(12): 3246-3252.
[10]van Osch JA, Mouden M, van Dalen JA, et al. Influence of iterative image reconstruction on CT-based calcium score measurements[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 30(5): 961-967.
[11]Mehta D, Thompson R, Morton T, et al. Iterative model reconstruction: Simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality[J]. Med Phys Intern J, 2013, 1(2): 147-155.
[12]Willemink MJ, den Harder AM, Foppen W, et al. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2016, 10(1): 69-75.
[13]den Harder AM, Willemink MJ, Bleys RL, et al. Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 30(6): 1125-1133.