Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the influence of different prandial state on pancreatic stiffness by MR elastography in healthy volunteers. Methods: Pancreatic stiffness measurements were got and compared in 24 healthy volunteers at 40 Hz and 60 Hz before and after a standard liquid meal(an effective method to increase pancreatic blood flow). Results: At 40 Hz, the mean pancreatic stiffness measurements before meal was significantly higher than after meal (1.174±0.121) kPa vs (1.106±0.123) kPa, t=5.95, P<0.001. At 60 Hz, the mean pancreatic stiffness measurements before and after a standard meal had no significant difference ((2.221±0.223) kPa vs (2.266±0.251) kPa, t=0.57, P=0.57). There was 6.2% difference between the two prandial states at 40 Hz. The image quality score of wave was (4.25±0.73) at 40 Hz and (2.41±0.83) at 60 Hz(P<0.001) at fast state. Conclusion: Compared with 60 Hz, 40 Hz had better wave pattern and can detect tiny changes of pancreatic stiffness,which is more suitable for pancreatic MRE.
张洪洋，刘艳清，纪若云，王 敏，石 喻. 进食状态对双频胰腺磁共振弹性成像的影响研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2018, 29(7): 491-493.
ZHANG Hong-yang, LIU Yan-qing, JI Ruo-yun, WANG Min, SHI Yu. Influence of different prandial state on pancreatic stiffness measured by#br#
MR elastography in healthy volunteers. JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 29(7): 491-493.
[1]Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Teo LL, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 39(1): 1-8.
[2]Shi Y, Glaser KJ, Venkatesh SK, et al. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 41(2): 369-375.
[3]Shi Y, Xia F, Li QJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and C by using both gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo planar imaging: a prospective study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2016, 111, (6): 823-833.
[4]Yoshimitsu K, Mitsufuji T, Shinagawa Y, et al. MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(3): 656-663.
[5]An H, Shi Y, Guo Q, et al. Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas[J]. Clin Radiol, 2016, 71(10): 1068.
[6]Dittmann F, Tzschatzsch H, Hirsch S, et al. Tomoelastography of the abdomen: tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2017, 78(3): 976-983.
[7]Brodovicz KG, Girman CJ, Simonis-Bik AM, et al. Postprandial metabolic responses to mixed versus liquid meal tests in healthy men and men with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2011, 94(3): 449-455.
[8]Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, et al. Hepatic MR elastography: clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations[J]. Radiology, 2016, 278(1): 114-124.
[9]Kelly KA, Hollingsworth MA, Brand RE, et al. Advances in biomedical imaging, bioengineering, and related technologies for the development of biomarkers of pancreatic disease: summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Workshop[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44(8): 1185-1194.
[10]Ipek-Ugay S, Tzschatzsch H, Hudert C, et al. Time harmonic elastography reveals sensitivity of liver stiffness to water ingestion[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(6): 1289-1294.
[11]Tzschatzsch H, Nguyen Trong M, Scheuermann T, et al. Two-dimensional time-harmonic elastography of the human liver and spleen[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(11): 2562-2571.
